British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 637-642
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/22307093
Estimation of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: standard anteroposterior scans vs sub-regional analyses of whole-body scans
M BOYANOV, MD, PhD
Endocrinology Clinic, Alexandrovska Hospital, Medical University of Sofia, BG 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
Correspondence: Dr M Boyanov, Endocrinology Clinic, Alexandrovska Hospital, 1 G Sofiiski str, Sofia 1431, Bulgaria. E-mail: boyanov{at}alexandrovska-hospital.bg
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (anteroposterior (AP) L1–L4 DXA) is one of the standards for testing bone density (BMD). Whole-body (WB) DXA scanning allows analysis of the L-spine (WB–LS). The objective of this study was (i) to predict the AP L1–L4 BMD from the WB–LS BMD, and (ii) to compare WB and AP L1–L4 T-scores. 132 women participated in the study (age, 50.84±9.69 years; range, 21–74 years). AP L1–L4 BMD was measured on a Hologic QDR 4500-A densitometer, and was followed by a WB scan. Linear regression analyses and curve estimations were performed for area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD and T-scores. Precision errors for BMD from AP scans and WB–LS scans were 1.37% and 1.65%, respectively. The best linear correlations were found for BMD, followed by the T-scores (R = 0.882 and 0.871; p<0.001). A power model for BMC (R2 = 0.630) and a model S for BMD and the scanned area (R2 = 0.841 and 0.539) were built. Discordant classification between AP L1–L4 and WB T-scores was found in 12.73% and 19.09% cases, respectively. WB T-score cut-off values of –2.35 and –0.90 produced the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio in the diagnosis of lumbar spine osteoporosis and low bone mass. In conclusion, WB–LS analysis may provide data for the indirect estimation of spinal BMD.
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.