BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online April 28, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 583-586
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/29344975

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HUGILL, J
Right arrow Articles by LOMAS, D J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HUGILL, J
Right arrow Articles by LOMAS, D J

Short Communication

MR sialography: the effect of a sialogogue and ductal occlusion in volunteers

J HUGILL, MRCP, FRCR E SALA, PhD, FRCS, FRCR K G HOLLINGSWORTH, MA, MEng, PhD and D J LOMAS, MA, FRCP, FRCR

Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 219, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ UK

Correspondence: D J Lomas, Department of Radiology, Box 219, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. E-mail: djl15{at}radiol.cam.ac.uk

MR sialography using heavily T2 weighted projection techniques relies upon saliva for image contrast, and the visualization of normal ducts is often limited. Methods used to increase the volume of intraductal saliva during imaging in order to improve duct visualization have not been previously evaluated. The effect of a sialogogue and passive ductal occlusion on the ability to visualize the main and intraglandular salivary gland ducts during MR sialography was investigated. Three-dimensional (3D) T2 weighted MR sialograms were obtained from 12 healthy volunteers with and without the combined use of a sialogogue and passive ductal occlusion pad adjacent to the parotid duct orifice on one side. Two radiologists (in consensus) subjectively evaluated ductal visualization and image artefacts on the resulting blinded maximum intensity projections. The results demonstrate that main duct visualization was significantly improved (p<0.00001) by this technique, with no significant change seen in image artefacts. Although an improvement in intraglandular duct visualization was noted, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.05). Thus, the use of a sialogogue and passive ductal occlusion improves visualization of the main parotid duct in volunteers undergoing MR sialography. Further optimization and evaluation of this approach should lead to improvements in the MR sialography examination of patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.