BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online March 17, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 537-544
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/54749779
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HUANG, D Y
Right arrow Articles by SIDHU, P S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HUANG, D Y
Right arrow Articles by SIDHU, P S

Full paper

Day-case diagnostic and interventional peripheral angiography: 10-year experience in a radiology specialist nurse-led unit

D Y HUANG, MRCPCH, FRCR 1 C-M ONG, RSN H L WALTERS, MRCP, FRCR 1 C J WILKINS, MRCP, FRCR 1 D R EVANS, FRCS, MRCP 1 R D EDMONDSON, MS, FRCR 2 K JONES, FRCS 2 H I RASHID, MS, FRCS 2 C D DEANE, PhD 3 D E GOSS, PhD 3 and P S SIDHU, BSc, MRCP, FRCR 1

Departments of 1 Radiology, 2 Vascular Surgery and 3 Vascular Laboratory, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK

Correspondence: Paul Sidhu, Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK. E-mail: paul.sidhu{at}kch.nhs.uk

We describe a prospective evaluation of the safety of peripheral angiography procedures performed on day-case patients in a dedicated radiological nurse-led and administrated unit. Patients referred for peripheral vascular angiography, over a 10-year period, were pre-assessed by a radiology specialist nurse in a nurse-led clinic. Radiologists performed all procedures, whereas radiology specialist nurses were responsible for patient care before, during and after angiography and during the 24 h follow-up. Procedures were divided into diagnostic or interventional; complications were divided into immediate or delayed (24 h follow-up) either requiring hospital admission (major) or day-case unit management (minor). Patient acceptability was assessed using a standard questionnaire. Cost analysis was also performed. 401 day-case peripheral angiography procedures (144 diagnostic and 257 interventional) were performed in 310 patients. 109/401 (27.2%) procedures were performed on patients with diabetes mellitus. In diagnostic studies, 16/144 (11.1%) immediate and 6/144 (4.2%) delayed complications occurred whereas, in interventional studies, 65/257 (25.3%) immediate and 13/257 (5.1%) delayed complications were noted. A major complication occurred in 17/257 (6.6%) of patients in the interventional group and 3/144 (2.1%) in the diagnostic group. Puncture site haematoma was the most common complication. Nurse-led care was acceptable to the patient, with a high level of patient satisfaction seen. In conclusion, day-case diagnostic and interventional peripheral angiography procedures can be performed safely in a specialist nurse-led and administrated unit, with complication rates being within the accepted guidelines.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
R. H. Samson
Setting Up an Outpatient Imaging Center: Adding Computed Tomographic Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography and an Outpatient Angiography Suite to Surgeon-Run Vascular Laboratories
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2008; 20(4): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.