BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 499-503
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/66819221

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by IBALL, G R
Right arrow Articles by BRETTLE, D S
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by IBALL, G R
Right arrow Articles by BRETTLE, D S

Short communication

Modelling the effect of lead and other materials for shielding of the fetus in CT pulmonary angiography

G R IBALL, MSc, BSc1, E V KENNEDY, BSc2 and D S BRETTLE, PhD, MSc, BSc1

1 Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, 2 Academic Unit of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Correspondence: D S Brettle, Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK. E-mail: gri{at}medphysics.leeds.ac.uk

The aim of this work is to construct and validate a model to describe the variation in fetal dose as a function of the thickness of abdominal lead shielding used during CT pulmonary angiography and to determine the optimal shielding material. An anthropomorphic phantom was modified to contain a 15 cm3 ionization chamber at the site of the uterus. Fetal dose was measured with varying thicknesses of lead shielding at four values of tube potential (kVp). Data generated by the proposed model were compared with experimental data to determine the validity of the model. The effect of lead shielding has been modelled accurately and results have shown that, although alternative materials could be used, lead is an effective and practical shielding material. In conclusion, lead remains a suitable shielding material and a pair of conventional lead aprons provides significant shielding for the fetus; we recommend that aprons should be reserved specifically for this purpose. However, it is possible that a dedicated and specifically designed lead shield could reduce fetal dose more effectively whilst also reducing patient discomfort.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.