BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online February 18, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 485-489
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/87860821
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MUNSHI, A
Right arrow Articles by SARIN, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MUNSHI, A
Right arrow Articles by SARIN, R

Full paper

A novel method for CT-scan-based localization of the internal mammary chain by internal mammary catheterization: an aid in breast cancer radiation therapy planning

A MUNSHI, MD 1 I MALLICK, MD 1 A BUDRUKKAR, MD 1 R JALALI, MD 1 R BADWE, MS 2 K A DINSHAW, FRCR 1 and R SARIN, FRCR 1

Departments of 1 Radiation Oncology and 2 Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and ACTREC, Parel, Mumbai, India

Correspondence: Dr Anusheel Munshi, Assistant Professor, Radiation Oncology, 120, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-400012, India. E-mail: anusheel8{at}hotmail.com

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the localization of the internal mammary lymph node chain (IMC) using CT scan data acquired after intraoperative placement of a catheter into the internal mammary vessel (IMV). CT data sets comprising 58 suitable patients with breast carcinoma undergoing placement of a catheter into the IMV during breast conservative surgery were evaluated for the study. CT was performed with a radio-opaque dummy wire placed into the IMC catheter. The following measurements were recorded in the second, third and the fourth intercostal spaces: anteroposterior distance from skin to the IMC catheter; transverse distance from mid-sternum to the IMC catheter; and anteroposterior distance from the skin to the heart. Finally, the IMC angle was determined. At the second intercostal space, the mean anteroposterior distance (range) was 29.0 mm (14.6–48.6 mm) and mean transverse distance was 26.1 mm (18.2–36.3 mm). The corresponding mean values for the third space were 32.5 mm (20.0–45.6 mm) and 24.1 mm (17.8–39.7 mm) and for the fourth intercostal space were 31.6 mm (21.1–45.6 mm) and 24.3 mm (15.6–34.3 mm), respectively. The mean skin to heart distance was 36.2 mm on the left side and 47.8 mm on the right side (p<0.001). The mean IMC angle was 40.3° (95% confidence interval: 25–55.6). There appears to be a wide variation in the depth and location of the IMC, as recorded by CT measurements of the catheter in the IMV, demonstrating the need for individual planning. The IMC nodal area is likely to be out of the tangential portals employed in conventional practice.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.