BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online February 4, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 474-478
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/32192801

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAWABE, A
Right arrow Articles by NAKAGIRI, Y
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KAWABE, A
Right arrow Articles by NAKAGIRI, Y

Full paper

Reduction in patient skin dose during interventional radiology with the use of an air gap substitute

A KAWABE, AMP, MSc, Y TAKEDA, MD, PhD and Y NAKAGIRI, PhD

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2–5–1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 7008558, Japan

Correspondence: A. Kawabe, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2–5–1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 7008558, Japan. E-mail: akawabe{at}md.okayama-u.ac.jp

Scattered radiation is inevitably generated in the patient couch during interventional radiology (IVR) procedures that use an under-couch tube system. Most of this scatter reaches the patient's skin surface and results in an increase in the skin dose without contributing to the diagnostic image. We considered that this unnecessary exposure could be reduced by the addition of an air gap between the couch and the patient. Because it is physically impossible to place an air gap on top of the couch and under the patient, we devised a new process in which an expanded polystyrene (EPS; {rho} = 0.0125 g cm–3) board is used as a substitute for the air gap. The results show that the EPS board played an effective role in reducing the skin dose to the patient. Using an EPS board 6 cm thick as an air gap substitute resulted in skin dose savings of ~9%. This method is easy to set up in clinical circumstances and is inexpensive. We recommend that this simple method of skin dose reduction be used for all IVR procedures.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.