This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by CHOI, E J Articles by KANG, E-Y PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by CHOI, E J Articles by KANG, E-Y

Comparison between coronal reformatted images and direct coronal CT images of the swine lung specimen: assessment of image quality with 64-detector row CT

Department of Radiology, Anam Hospital, Korea University, Seoul

Correspondence: Yu-Whan Oh, Department of Radiology, Anam Hospital, Korea University, Anam 5-ga, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea. E-mail: yuwhan{at}kumc.or.kr

The aims of this study were to compare the image quality of coronal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images from axial spiral images with that of direct coronal spiral and sequential images, and to estimate and analyse the effect of an incremental change on the image quality using 64-detector row CT. 12 swine lungs were used. Five kinds of images from each lung specimen were obtained using 64-detector row CT. All images were analysed by categories and grades, and the direct coronal sequential images were used as the reference standard for the image quality. Statistical analysis was performed for the following categories: (i) inter-observer reliability, (ii) interaction between the observers and images, (iii) image analysis, (iv) anatomical structural analysis of each observer, (v) stair-step artefact and (vi) background noise. The overall image quality and the image quality of all anatomical structures of coronal MPR images with 0.67 mm slice increments were inferior to the image quality of the other images; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Stair-step artefact was detected on coronal MPR images, and was more prominent on coronal MPR images with 0.67 mm slice increments than on coronal MPR images with 0.34 mm slice increments. The most severe background noise was detected on the direct coronal sequential images, but there was no significant difference between the direct coronal sequential images and the direct coronal spiral images. Background noise was least prominent on coronal MPR images with 0.67 mm slice increments. The increment process is important for improving the image quality of MPR images even when using 64-detector row CT. Coronal MPR images with 0.34 mm slice increments using 64-detector row CT showed a similar image quality to that obtained from the direct coronal images, and can be used instead. This means that the coronal MPR images obtained with 64-detector row CT could be as useful for evaluating the lung parenchyma as the axial high-resolution CT images.