| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Full paper |
1 Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and, 2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA, 3 Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Chelyabinsk Oblast, Ozyorsk, Ozyorskoeshosse 19, 456780 Russia, 4 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA, 5 MAYAK Production Association, Chelyabinsk Oblast, Ozyorsk, Ozyorskoeshosse 19, 456780 Russia, 6 Nuclear Engineering Program, University of Utah, 50 South Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
Correspondence: Richard Day, PhD, A443 Crabtree Hall, GSPH University of Pittsburgh, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. E-mail: rdfac{at}pitt.edu
Our goal was to adapt current diagnostic methods for radiation overexposure patients into a practical system that can be implemented rapidly and reliably by responders unfamiliar with the effects of radiation. Our Radiation Injury Severity Classification (RISC) system uses clinical and haematological parameters from the prodromal phase of the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) to classify acute radiation injury for purposes of managing treatment disposition. Data from well-documented ARS cases were used to test the RISC system. Three-day summaries were generated for each case. These were individually reviewed by the three physicians most involved with the development of the system to establish both a consensus case score (CCS) and disposition category ranges. 30 volunteer raters from varying health disciplines using the RISC system then each independently rated a random selection of 12 cases for injury severity in a self-trained field-simulation exercise. The CCS identified discrete cut-off ranges for the three disposition categories in both manageable and mass casualty events. The group of raters, after a modest period of self-training, achieved overall levels of pairwise agreement with the CCS category of 0.944 for manageable events and 0.947 for mass casualty situations. In conclusion, an early assessment of the severity of the ARS injury is required for an appropriate disposition determination. The RISC system should produce reasonably accurate and reliable assessments of radiation injury severity within 6–12 hours post exposure despite the probable absence of physical dosimetric data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Weinstock, C. Case Jr, J. L. Bader, N. J. Chao, C. N. Coleman, R. J. Hatchett, D. J. Weisdorf, and D. L. Confer Radiologic and nuclear events: contingency planning for hematologists/oncologists Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5440 - 5445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |