BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online January 7, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 232-243
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/25373719

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KUNIAK, M
Right arrow Articles by SLAUGHTER, D M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KUNIAK, M
Right arrow Articles by SLAUGHTER, D M

Full paper

The Radiation Injury Severity Classification system: an early injury assessment tool for the frontline health-care provider

M KUNIAK, DO 1 T AZIZOVA, MD 3 R DAY, PhD 2 N WALD, MD 1 J SUYAMA, MD 4 A ZHANG, MD 1,* M V SUMINA, MD 3 V S PESTERNIKOVA, MD 3 E VASILENKO, PhD 5 A SOAITA, MD, DrPH 2,** and D M SLAUGHTER, PhD 6

1 Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and, 2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA, 3 Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Chelyabinsk Oblast, Ozyorsk, Ozyorskoeshosse 19, 456780 Russia, 4 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA, 5 MAYAK Production Association, Chelyabinsk Oblast, Ozyorsk, Ozyorskoeshosse 19, 456780 Russia, 6 Nuclear Engineering Program, University of Utah, 50 South Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA

Correspondence: Richard Day, PhD, A443 Crabtree Hall, GSPH University of Pittsburgh, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. E-mail: rdfac{at}pitt.edu

Our goal was to adapt current diagnostic methods for radiation overexposure patients into a practical system that can be implemented rapidly and reliably by responders unfamiliar with the effects of radiation. Our Radiation Injury Severity Classification (RISC) system uses clinical and haematological parameters from the prodromal phase of the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) to classify acute radiation injury for purposes of managing treatment disposition. Data from well-documented ARS cases were used to test the RISC system. Three-day summaries were generated for each case. These were individually reviewed by the three physicians most involved with the development of the system to establish both a consensus case score (CCS) and disposition category ranges. 30 volunteer raters from varying health disciplines using the RISC system then each independently rated a random selection of 12 cases for injury severity in a self-trained field-simulation exercise. The CCS identified discrete cut-off ranges for the three disposition categories in both manageable and mass casualty events. The group of raters, after a modest period of self-training, achieved overall levels of pairwise agreement with the CCS category of 0.944 for manageable events and 0.947 for mass casualty situations. In conclusion, an early assessment of the severity of the ARS injury is required for an appropriate disposition determination. The RISC system should produce reasonably accurate and reliable assessments of radiation injury severity within 6–12 hours post exposure despite the probable absence of physical dosimetric data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
D. M. Weinstock, C. Case Jr, J. L. Bader, N. J. Chao, C. N. Coleman, R. J. Hatchett, D. J. Weisdorf, and D. L. Confer
Radiologic and nuclear events: contingency planning for hematologists/oncologists
Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5440 - 5445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.