BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online January 7, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 187-191
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/28555221

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by YAGCI, B
Right arrow Articles by KIROGLU, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by YAGCI, B
Right arrow Articles by KIROGLU, Y

Full paper

Clinical significance and renal haemodynamics of incidentally detected retroaortic left renal vein: assessment with venous Doppler sonography

B YAGCI, MD, B TAVASLI, MD, N KARABULUT, MD and Y KIROGLU, MD

Department of Radiology, Pamukkale University Hospital, Denizli, Turkey

Correspondence: Dr A B Yagci, Zumrut Mah. 2091 Sokak No. 44, 20225 Denizli, Turkey. E-mail: bakiyagci{at}yahoo.com

The purpose of this study was to determine whether renal venous pulsations are affected by compression of the left renal vein (LRV) between the aorta and spine, and also to determine the clinical significance of incidentally detected retroaortic LRV. The study population was recruited from 783 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal CT examination for various indications. 22 patients with a retroaortic LRV were prospectively enrolled in this study, and 22 patients without renal disease served as a control group. After measuring the diameters of the central and peripheral portions of the LRV on CT images, the ratio (P/C) and difference (P–C) of the diameters were calculated. Doppler sonography of the interlobar arteries and veins of the left kidney was then performed to obtain impedance indices. Urine analysis of all subjects and scrotal colour Doppler ultrasound of male patients were also performed. The retroaortic LRV diameters were significantly narrower than the pre-aortic LRV diameters (p = 0.002). The left intrarenal venous impedance indices were significantly higher in the patients with retroaortic LRV (p = 0.026) and in the subgroups with P/C>2 (p = 0.020), with P–C>4 mm (p = 0.007) and without nutcracker-like associations (p = 0.006) than in control subjects, but no significant difference was noted between the arterial resistance indices. Haematuria (n = 8), proteinuria (n = 4), varicocele (n = 3) and collaterals (n = 1) were detected in the study group but not in the control group. In conclusion, incidentally detected retroaortic LRV appears to be associated with haematuria, proteinuria, varicocele and altered venous pulsatility. Further investigations are needed to understand the role of venous Doppler ultrasound in the nutcracker phenomenon.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.