BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online January 21, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 172-179
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/21074350

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERMEJO-PÉREZ, M J
Right arrow Articles by LLANOS-MÉNDEZ, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BERMEJO-PÉREZ, M J
Right arrow Articles by LLANOS-MÉNDEZ, A

Review article

Cancer surveillance based on imaging techniques in carriers of BRCA1/2 gene mutations: a systematic review

M J BERMEJO-PÉREZ, MD, PhD S MÁRQUEZ-CALDERÓN, MD, PhD and A LLANOS-MÉNDEZ, MD

Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (Spain), Avda. de la Innovación, S/N°, Edificio Arena 1, Planta baja, 41020 Seville, Spain

Correspondence: M J Bermejo-Pérez, Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (Spain), Avda. de la Innovación, S/N°, Edificio Arena 1, Planta baja, 41020 Seville, Spain. E-mail: mjbp{at}andaluciajunta.es

We have systematically reviewed the literature focusing on the performance of surveillance programmes and imaging techniques for the early diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer in women carrying mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. A search for relevant articles published between 1996 and 2005 (inclusive) was run on Medline, Embase and other databases. Of the 749 articles retrieved, only 13 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 provided information on breast cancer surveillance, 1 on ovarian cancer surveillance and a further study addressed both cancer types. A critical appraisal of the studies was performed using a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS). The synthesis of results is qualitative. All studies on imaging techniques for the diagnosis of breast cancer indicated that screening MRI had the highest sensitivity (between 77% and 100%). Breast cancer surveillance programmes, including MRI, achieved the highest diagnostic performance (between 83% and 95%) for all women. However, it must be taken into account that biases that may affect the validity of the outcomes were seen in the evaluated studies. Also, MRI is an expensive test with a low positive predictive value and, to date, MRI screening has not been proven to reduce mortality rates in women carrying BRCA1/2 gene mutations. As a result of the scant information and low quality of the papers reviewed, no definitive conclusion could be drawn on the performance of ovarian cancer surveillance in women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.