BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online October 29, 2007
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 10-19
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/19492531

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton, S
Right arrow Articles by Swift, R I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burton, S
Right arrow Articles by Swift, R I

Full paper

Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancer

S Burton, FRCS 1 G Brown, FRCR 2 N Bees, FRCR 1 A Norman, PhD 2 O Biedrzycki, FRCPath 1 A Arnaout, FRCPath 1 A M Abulafi, FRCS 1 and R I Swift, FRCS 1

1 Departments of Colorectal Surgery, Radiology and Histopathology, Mayday University Hospital, London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, 2 Royal Marsden Hospital, Departments of Radiology and Statistics, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK

Correspondence: Dr Gina Brown, Department of Radiology, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK. E-mail: Gina.Brown{at}rmh.nhs.uk

Whilst imaging of poor prognostic features in rectal cancers has assisted pre-operative treatment stratification, such features have yet to be evaluated in colonic cancers. This study aims to develop criteria for identifying poor prognostic features in colonic tumours and assess the accuracy of CT prediction against histopathology. Criteria were developed for predicting T-stage and N-stage, the presence of extramural vascular invasion and involvement of the retroperitoneal surgical margin (RSM). These criteria were tested on 33 patients with colonic cancer who underwent pre-operative high-resolution CT of their tumour. Two radiologists (Obs 1 and Obs 2) identified independently these poor prognostic features and the results were compared with the final histopathological results. Histological agreement and interobserver variation were calculated using the kappa test. Accuracy of CT prediction of tumour extension beyond muscularis propria was 82% (Obs 1) and 70% (Obs 2). Correct prediction of RSM involvement was 76% (95% confidence interval (CI): 57.8–88.9%) and 79% (95%CI: 61.1–91%) for Obs1 and Obs 2, respectively, with significant agreement between observers ({kappa} = 0.455, p = 0.050). Prognosis was correctly predicted using CT in 82% (95%CI: 61.5–81.2%) (Obs1) and 85% (95%CI: 68.1–94.9%) (Obs2) with moderate agreement ({kappa} = 0.459, {kappa} = 0.527, respectively) with histology. In conclusion, CT has potential as the imaging modality of choice in the pre-operative prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancers and could play a role in future treatment stratification.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR review of the year - 2008.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2009; 82(975): 180 - 182.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.