This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by THOMPSON, P M Articles by APOSTOLOVA, L G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by THOMPSON, P M Articles by APOSTOLOVA, L G

Computational anatomical methods as applied to ageing and dementia

¹ Laboratory of NeuroImaging, ² Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Correspondence: Dr Paul Thompson, Professor of Neurology, Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, 635 Charles Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769, USA. E-mail: thompson{at}loni.ucla.edu

The cellular hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) accumulate in the living brain up to 30 years before the characteristic symptoms of dementia can be identified. Brain changes in AD are difficult to distinguish from those in normal ageing, and this has led to the development of powerful computational methods to extract statistical information on the brain changes that are characteristic of AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and different dementia subtypes. Time-lapse maps can be built to show how the disease spreads in the brain, and where treatment affects the disease trajectory. Here, we review three computational approaches to map brain deficits in AD: cortical thickness maps, tensor-based morphometry and hippocampal/ventricular surface modelling. Anatomical structures, modelled as three-dimensional geometrical surfaces, are mathematically combined across subjects for group or interval comparisons. Mathematical concepts from computational surface modelling, fluid mechanics and multivariate statistics are exploited to distinguish disease from normal variations in brain structure. These methods yield insight into the dynamics of AD and MCI, showing where brain changes correlate with cognitive or behavioural changes such as language dysfunction or apathy. We describe cortical and hippocampal changes that distinguish dementia subtypes (such as Lewy-body dementia, HIV-associated dementia and AD), and we describe brain changes that predict recovery or decline in those at risk. Finally, we indicate which computational methods are powerful enough to track dementia in clinical trials, on the basis of their efficiency and sensitivity to early change, and the detail in the measures they provide.