BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online October 29, 2007
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 1011-1014
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/14945156

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C R
Right arrow Articles by Moloney, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C R
Right arrow Articles by Moloney, A J

Short communication

An update survey of UK in vivo radiotherapy dosimetry practice

C R Edwards, PhD, MIPEM, E Hamer, MSC, MIPEM, P J Mountford, PhD, FBIR and A J Moloney, BSc, FBIR

Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7LN, UK

Correspondence: Dr Craig Edwards, Radiotherapy Physics, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7LN. E-mail: craig.edwards{at}uhns.nhs.uk

A questionnaire was distributed in 2004 to 59 radiotherapy physics departments in the UK to determine whether in vivo dosimetry practice had changed since a similar survey conducted 10 years earlier. The number of centres carrying out central axis dosimetry had increased slightly from 17 centres in 1994 to 22 centres in 2004, with a diode alone being the most commonly used detector. Twice as many centres (43) carried out critical organ dosimetry compared with those carrying out central axis measurements, and this number had also increased slightly above the 1994 value (38). A diode was used by most centres carrying out central axis dosimetry and by about 50% of centres carrying out critical organ dosimetry. The action level adopted by each centre for central axis measurements varied from >±3% to >±10% difference between the measured and the prescribed dose, with >±5% being the most frequent value. It was concluded that there had been little change in in vivo dosimetry practice during the time between the two surveys, and that guidance on the method and applications for in vivo dosimetry is required before recent recommendations for its widespread adoption for routine use can be satisfied.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.