BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online September 17, 2007
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 872-877
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/80553348
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, N H
Right arrow Articles by Song, J S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, N H
Right arrow Articles by Song, J S

Full paper

Ultrasonographic findings identifying the faecal-impacted appendix: differential findings with acute appendicitis

N H Park, MD1, C S Park, MD1, E J Lee, MD1, M S Kim, MD1, J A Ryu, MD1, J M Bae, MD2 and J S Song, MD3

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University, College of Medicine, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Cheju National University, College of Medicine, 3 Department of Pathology, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University, College of Medicine, Korea

Correspondence: Noh Hyuck Park, 697-24 Hwajung-dong, Dukyang-ku, Koyang, Kyunggi 412-270, Korea. E-mail: nhpark904{at}kwandong.ac.kr

The aim of this study was to identify ultrasonographic findings that show the normal faecal-impacted appendix, in order to avoid unnecessary surgery via a misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis. Of 160 patients who underwent ultrasonography between January 2004 and July 2005 for right lower quadrant pain, 22 cases (including 7 cases confirmed pathologically and 15 confirmed clinically and on follow-up ultrasonography) were diagnosed as a normal faecal-impacted appendix. The criteria that we used to distinguish a faecal-impacted appendix from acute appendicitis include preservation of the normal wall layering of the appendix, maximum mural thickness, presence of peri-appendiceal fat infiltration and increased blood flow in the appendiceal wall. The maximum measured outer diameter of a normal faecal-impacted appendix was 0.54–1.03 cm, with a mean diameter of 0.68 cm. The maximum mural thickness ranged from 0.08 cm to 0.26 cm, with a mean thickness of 0.15 cm. The normal wall layers of the appendix were preserved and no evidence was seen of peri-appendiceal fat infiltration in any case. No demonstrably increased blood flow in the appendiceal wall was observed. In conclusion, faecal impaction increases the outer transverse diameter of the normal appendix, frequently leading to a misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis. Recognition of preservation of the normal layering of the appendiceal wall, smaller maximal outer diameter, thinner maximal mural thickness, the absence of peri-appendiceal mesenteric infiltration and no demonstrably increased blood flow in the appendiceal wall should help to prevent unnecessary surgery.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.