BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online September 17, 2007
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 835-840
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/41664978

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, M A
Right arrow Articles by Britten, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, M A
Right arrow Articles by Britten, A J

Short communication

Accurate geometric calibration in stepping-table digital subtraction angiography

M A Schmidt, PhD 1 S L Nayak, DCR(R) 2 A-M Belli, FRCR 2 and A J Britten, PhD 1

Departments of 1 Medical Physics and 2 Radiology, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK

Correspondence: Dr M A Schmidt, Department of Medical Physics, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK. E-mail: maria.schmidt{at}stgeorges.nhs.uk

Accurate measurements of vessel dimensions are desirable in many clinical applications. This work uses the known relative motion between X-ray source and the patient in stepping-table digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to provide an accurate geometric calibration for quantitative measurements. The method results in a calibration factor that converts the size of the object measured in pixels on the image to its size in millimetres. The main sources of error relate to: (i) the assessment of relative displacement of a structure in a series of images; (ii) patient motion throughout data acquisition; and (iii) image distortion. Error was evaluated both with a test object consisting of a large grid of ball bearings (2x2 cm spaced) and, in vivo, in five renal DSA examinations performed with identical catheters of known diameter. The calibration factor was calculated with 0.1% accuracy for the test object and at least 2% accuracy in vivo, even with breath holding and pulsatile motion. This demonstrates that the calculation of the calibration factor can be very accurate, and that the method we propose is capable of the submillimetre accuracy required for clinical studies if used in conjunction with an accurate measurement of the vessel size in pixels. In conclusion, accurate geometric measurements can be performed in stepping-table DSA, without the need for external reference objects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.