BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online September 17, 2007
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 807-815
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/77948690

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dougeni, E D
Right arrow Articles by Panayiotakis, G S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dougeni, E D
Right arrow Articles by Panayiotakis, G S

Full paper

Dose and image quality optimization in neonatal radiography

E D Dougeni, MSc 1 H B Delis, PhD 1 A A Karatza, MD, PhD 2 C P Kalogeropoulou, MD, PhD 3 S G Skiadopoulos, PhD 1 S P Mantagos, MD, PhD 2 and G S Panayiotakis, PhD 1

Departments of 1 Medical Physics, 2 Paediatrics and 3 Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 265 00 Patras, Greece

Correspondence: George S Panayiotakis, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 265 00 Patras, Greece. E-mail: panayiot{at}upatras.gr

In a special care baby unit, neonates, mainly premature, encounter serious to life-threatening diseases, the timely diagnosis and treatment of which may require a large number of radiographs. Increased neonatal radiosensitivity and longer life expectancy increase the risk of radiation-induced cancer, which emphasizes the importance of minimizing dose while maintaining clinically satisfactory image quality. An optimization study on radiation dose and image quality in neonatal radiography is presented. Neonates were categorized into four groups depending on birthweight. For a total of 378 chest and chest–abdomen radiographs, exposure parameters were recorded. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was estimated and dose–area product (DAP) was measured. Image quality evaluation was performed by two observers and was based on the visibility of certain anatomical features and catheters placed during treatment using a five-grade scale. ESD values increased with neonatal weight and demonstrated wide variation (16.4–76.9 µGy, mean 38.2 µGy). A wide variation was also observed in DAP values (1.2–15.0 mGycm2, mean 7.2 mGycm2). Image quality evaluation revealed the feasibility of achieving a diagnostically satisfactory image (score >70%) using both low and high tube voltage techniques, with the latter resulting in reduced ESDs. The majority of estimated ESDs are in accordance with the reference level of 50 µGy recommended by the National Radiological Protection Board for neonatal radiography. The results suggest that the use of high tube voltage techniques could result in further reductions in neonatal dose, without image quality degradation, underlying the requirement for establishing standard examination protocols for neonatal radiography with respect to neonatal weight.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.