This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, C J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martin, C J

Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?

Health Physics, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, West House, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK

Correspondence: Dr Colin John Martin, Head of Health Physics, Department of Clinical Physics and Bio-Engineering, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, West House, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK. E-mail: colin.martin{at}northglasgow.scot.nhs.uk

The effective dose (E) was created to provide a dose quantity that was related to the probability of health detriment due to stochastic effects from exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. E is derived from the weighted sum of doses to tissues that are known to be sensitive to radiation and so can only be derived by calculation. The tissue weighting factors are derived from the extrapolation of epidemiological evidence. E was intended for use in radiation protection, but has found wide application in evaluation of doses for medical exposures involving only parts of the body. More reliance is often placed on E values and risk estimates based on E than the evidence on which it is based can justify. In this paper, the uncertainties in the estimated values of E for a reference patient and the associated risk coefficients are reviewed in order to provide an indication of how much reliance can be placed on E as an indicator of risk for patients. The relative uncertainty in estimated values of E for medical exposures for a reference patient is seen to be about ±40%. The estimated risk of cancer may be a factor of three higher or lower when applied to a reference patient, and will be more variable when applied to an individual. A set of recommendations relating to the use of E and description of risk for medical exposures is proposed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Angel, N. Yaghmai, C. M. Jude, J. J. DeMarco, C. H. Cagnon, J. G. Goldin, C. H. McCollough, A. N. Primak, D. D. Cody, D. M. Stevens, et al. Dose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1340 - 1345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Mettler Jr, M. Bhargavan, K. Faulkner, D. B. Gilley, J. E. Gray, G. S. Ibbott, J. A. Lipoti, M. Mahesh, J. L. McCrohan, M. G. Stabin, et al. Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Studies in the United States and Worldwide: Frequency, Radiation Dose, and Comparison with Other Radiation Sources--1950-2007 Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 520 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Fazel, H. M. Krumholz, Y. Wang, J. S. Ross, J. Chen, H. H. Ting, N. D. Shah, K. Nasir, A. J. Einstein, and B. K. Nallamothu Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures N. Engl. J. Med., August 27, 2009; 361(9): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E COLANGELO, J. JOHNSTON, J. B KILLION, and D. L. WRIGHT Radiation Biology and Protection Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2009; 80(5): 421 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Dietze, J D Harrison, and H G Menzel Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3) Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2009; 82(976): 348 - 351. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sodickson, P. F. Baeyens, K. P. Andriole, L. M. Prevedello, R. D. Nawfel, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani Recurrent CT, Cumulative Radiation Exposure, and Associated Radiation-induced Cancer Risks from CT of Adults Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 175 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Mayo and J. A. Leipsic Radiation Dose in Cardiac CT Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 646 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Gerber, J. J. Carr, A. E. Arai, R. L. Dixon, V. A. Ferrari, A. S. Gomes, G. V. Heller, C. H. McCollough, M. F. McNitt-Gray, F. A. Mettler, et al. Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 1056 - 1065. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Shrimpton, B. F. Wall, T. T. Yoshizumi, L. M. Hurwitz, and P. C. Goodman Effective Dose and Dose-Length Product in CT Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 604 - 605. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J A ROBERTS, N A DRAGE, J DAVIES, and D W THOMAS Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): 35 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J Einstein Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1519 - 1521. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. R. Verdun, F. Bochud, F. Gundinchet, A. Aroua, P. Schnyder, and R. Meuli Quality Initiatives Radiation Risk: What You Should Know to Tell Your Patient1 RadioGraphics, November 1, 2008; 28(7): 1807 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. R. Verdun, F. Bochud, F. Gudinchet, A. Aroua, P. Schnyder, and R. Meuli Radiation Risk: What You Should Know to Tell Your Patient RadioGraphics, September 24, 2008; (2008) 287085042. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. B. Ludlow, L. E. Davies-Ludlow, and S. C. White Patient Risk Related to Common Dental Radiographic Examinations: The Impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection Recommendations Regarding Dose Calculation J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2008; 139(9): 1237 - 1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Smans, L. Struelens, M. Smet, H. Bosmans, and F. Vanhavere PATIENT DOSE IN NEONATAL UNITS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, August 30, 2008; (2008) ncn237v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Smans, L. Struelens, M.-T. Hoornaert, F. Bleeser, N. Buls, D. Berus, P. Clerinx, F. Malchair, F. Vanhavere, and H. Bosmans A study of the correlation between dose area product and effective dose in vascular radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(3): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D J BRENNER Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 521 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Martin RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Martin The application of effective dose to medical exposures Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2008; 128(1): 1 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P P Dendy Radiation risks in interventional radiology Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]