BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 537-544
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/34603706

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nickoloff, E L
Right arrow Articles by Alderson, P O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nickoloff, E L
Right arrow Articles by Alderson, P O

Full paper

A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT

E L Nickoloff, DSC and P O Alderson, MD

Department of Radiology, Columbia University and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, Milstein Bldg Room 3-265B, New York, NY 10032-3784, USA

Correspondence: Professor Edward Lee Nickoloff, DSc, Columbia University, 177 Ft. Washington Avenue, Millstein Hospital Bldg Rm 3-265B, New York, NY 10032-3784, USA. E-mail: eln1{at}columbia.edu

The goal of this study was to measure radiation doses for 64-slice cardiac CT angiography studies and to study the dose-savings features of these CT scanners. This was done using various phantoms. These radiation doses were compared with those from typical helical body CT scans, fluoroscopy cardiac catheterization studies and mammography examinations. Radiation measurements were made with a CT ionization detector and a solid state dosimeter. A GE 64-slice Lightspeed VCT and a Siemens Somatom Sensation 64 CT were used to scan a standard 32 cm acrylic phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom. Data were collected in axial and various gated cardiac helical modes. Organ doses and the effective doses were calculated from the measurements. In gated CT cardiac mode with the 32 cm acrylic phantom, the measured radiation doses per study were generally three to seven times greater than those from typical body helical CT examinations; the range depended upon selectable scan parameters. With the anatomical phantom, the surface doses in the anteroposterior (AP) plane were typically 20–60% higher than those measured using the 32 cm phantom. The lateral surface doses were –4% to +15%. These results can be attributed to the shorter AP dimension and the air in the lungs. The CT skin entrance radiation doses were 80–90% less than diagnostic cardiac catheterization studies, and organ doses were similar. Because 64-slice cardiac gated CT uses pitches equal to 0.20–0.27 and high mAs values, the patient radiation doses are appreciably higher than in routine body CT examinations. The female breast, which could receive a radiation dose 10–30 times that received from mammography screening, is an organ of particular concern.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Maruyama, M. Takada, T. Hasuike, A. Yoshikawa, E. Namimatsu, and T. Yoshizumi
Radiation Dose Reduction and Coronary Assessability of Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: Comparison With Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Helical Scan
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 28, 2008; 52(18): 1450 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. L. Nickoloff, Z. F. Lu, A. K. Dutta, and J. C. So
Radiation Dose Descriptors: BERT, COD, DAP, and Other Strange Creatures
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1439 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.