BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, e117-e118
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/16931054

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashraf, K
Right arrow Articles by Zubairi, T A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashraf, K
Right arrow Articles by Zubairi, T A

Case report

Renal lymphangiectasia

K Ashraf, FCPS, FRCR 2A1, S S Raza, MBBS2, O Ashraf, MBBS3, W Memon, FCPS2, A Memon, FRCS4 and T A Zubairi, MBBS2

1 Cross-sectional Imaging Section, James Paget University Hospitals, Norfolk NP31 6LA, UK, 2 Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, 3 Medical College, Aga Khan University, 4 Department of Urology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan

Correspondence: Kashif Ashraf, Consultant Radiologist, Cross-sectional Imaging Section, James Paget University Hospitals, Norfolk NR31 6LA, UK. E-mail: kashif.ashraf{at}jpaget.nhs.uk

Renal lymphangiectasia is a benign disorder of renal lymphatics. Seldom observed, the pathophysiology is unclear. The clinical course may vary, and management alternatives range from percutaneous drainage in symptomatic cases to pharmacological substitutes in the form of anti-hypertensives and diuretics. We present a case of bilateral perinephric collections on imaging, which presented with gross ascites, abdominal pain and reversible hypertension. Ultrasound examination indicated ascites. Computerized tomography revealed bilateral symmetrical large perinephric collections. This is consistent with the appearance of renal lymphangiectasis (enlarged kidneys with fluid collections seen to be abutting the surrounding structures) reported in the literature. Needle aspiration of the perinephric fluid was undertaken, and laboratory analysis was carried out, which revealed a protein level of 643 mg dl–1 and a total leucocyte count of 50, of which 80% were lymphocytes. Thereafter, a diagnosis of renal lymphangiectasia was made, and conservative treatment with diuretics and anti-hypertensives was initiated. Reassessment at subsequent follow up visits showed improvement in the patient's clinical condition.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.