This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Siiskonen, T Articles by Vartiainen, E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Siiskonen, T Articles by Vartiainen, E

Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology

STUK – Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, PO Box 14, FIN-00881 Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence: Dr Teemu Siiskonen, Stuk–Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, PO Box 14, FIN-00881 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: teemu.siiskonen{at}stuk.fi

Occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology can potentially be high. Therefore, reliable methods to assess the effective dose are needed. In the present work, the relationship between the personal dose equivalent, H_p(10), the reading of a personal dosimeter and the effective dose of the radiologist were studied using Monte Carlo simulations. In particular, the protection provided by a lead apron was investigated. Emphasis was placed on sensitivity of the results to changes in irradiation conditions. In our simulations a 0.35 mm thick lead apron and thyroid shield reduced the effective dose, on average, by a factor of 27 (the range of these data was 15–41). Without the thyroid shield the average reduction factor was 15 (range 6–22). The reduction sensitively depended on the projection and the X-ray tube voltage. The dosimeter reading, when the dosimeter was worn above the apron and a thyroid shield was used, overestimated the effective dose on average by a factor of 130 (range 44–258) when the dosimeter was located on the breast closest to the primary X-ray beam. Without the thyroid shield the average overestimation was 69 (range 32–127). If the dosimeter was worn under the apron its reading generally underestimated the effective dose (on average by 20% with the thyroid shield). Our study indicates that, even though large variations are present, the often used conversion coefficient from the dosimeter reading above the apron to the effective dose, around 1/30, generally overestimates the effective dose by a factor of two or more.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Martin A REVIEW OF RADIOLOGY STAFF DOSES AND DOSE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 16, 2009; (2009) ncp168v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. O. Lie, G. U. Paulsen, and T. Wohni ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVE DOSE AND DOSE TO THE LENS OF THE EYE FOR THE INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGIST Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 4, 2008; (2008) ncn296v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Jarvinen, N. Buls, P. Clerinx, S. Miljanic, D. Nikodemova, M. Ranogajec-Komor, L. Struelens, and F. d'Errico COMPARISON OF DOUBLE DOSIMETRY ALGORITHMS FOR ESTIMATING THE EFFECTIVE DOSE IN OCCUPATIONAL DOSIMETRY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY STAFF Radiat Prot Dosimetry, August 30, 2008; (2008) ncn239v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Jarvinen, N. Buls, P. Clerinx, J. Jansen, S. Miljanic, D. Nikodemova, M. Ranogajec-Komor, and F. d'Errico OVERVIEW OF DOUBLE DOSIMETRY PROCEDURES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECTIVE DOSE TO THE INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY STAFF Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 14, 2008; (2008) ncn082v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Siiskonen, M. Tapiovaara, A. Kosunen, M. Lehtinen, and E. Vartiainen Occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology: simulations Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 36 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]