This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kiljunen, T Articles by Savolainen, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kiljunen, T Articles by Savolainen, S

Diagnostic reference levels for thorax X-ray examinations of paediatric patients

¹ Radiation Practices Regulation, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, PO Box 14, FI-00881, Helsinki, ² Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 64, FI-00014, Helsinki, ³ HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, PO Box 340, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence: Mr Timo Kiljunen, Radiation Practices Regulation, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Laippatie 4, PO Box 14, Helsinki, FI-00881, Finland. E-mail: timo.kiljunen{at}stuk.fi; timo.kiljunen{at}helsinki.fi

Based on the Medical Exposure Directive of the European Commission, 97/43/Euratom, The Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) in Finland has the responsibility for setting national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the most common radiological examinations. Paediatric patients deserve special attention because of the higher radiation risk compared with adults. The purpose of this paper is to present a method that takes into account patient size when setting DRLs in paediatric patients. The overall data consisted of patient doses collected from six hospitals during the years 1994–2001, and new measurements in two hospitals in 2004. In total, there were 700 chest examinations. The method established by the National Radiological Protection Board (UK) for setting DRLs was not considered feasible in Finnish practice. Patient doses correlated exponentially with the projection thickness, which was measured directly for each patient. Since 1 January 2006, paediatric DRLs for conventional chest examinations have been specified in Finland as a DRL curve by using both dose quantities (entrance surface doses (ESD) and dose–area product (DAP)) as a function of patient projection thickness.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				BJR review of the year -- 2007 Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 265 - 269. [Full Text] [PDF]