BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online October 12, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 256-260
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/82769410

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D P
Right arrow Articles by Eatough, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D P
Right arrow Articles by Eatough, J P

Full paper

Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations

D P Thompson, MSc, C J Koller, MSc and J P Eatough, PhD

The University Hospital Of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK

Correspondence: Mr D P Thompson, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Princes Road, Stoke–on–Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7LN, UK. E-mail: david.thompson{at}uhns.nhs.uk

The performance of 14 primary clinical display monitor workstations in use in the Radiology Department of a large acute NHS Trust was assessed using the methods and guidelines described by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18. Tests undertaken included the measurement of ambient light, display uniformity, luminance ratio, luminance response, maximum luminance and spatial resolution. Four display monitors failed to meet at least one of the test's guideline tolerances. In addition a number of display monitors were found to be operating at settings that might reduce their useful life span. These devices were either replaced or recalibrated by the installers, or were subject to local adjustment to ensure applicable standards were met. Consequently the study suggests that quality assurance testing of display monitors used for image reporting is necessary and valuable to ensure that images are viewed at an appropriate standard.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR review of the year -- 2007
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 265 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.