This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allen, S D Articles by Blunt, D M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allen, S D Articles by Blunt, D M

Variation of mesorectal volume with abdominal fat volume in patients with rectal carcinoma: assessment with MRI

Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK

Correspondence: Dr Steven D Allen, Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK. E-mail: stevendallen{at}hotmail.co.uk

The purpose of this study was to assess the variability in the volume of the mesorectum in patients with rectal carcinoma. A retrospective review was made of pelvic MRI studies in 30 patients (mean age 64 years, range 34–88 years, 18M:12F) with histologically proven rectal carcinomas that were confined to the mesorectum. The outer low signal margin of the mesorectum was traced, over at least 10 consecutive 10 mm contiguous slices, until its disappearance. The visceral fascial compartment, body cross-sectional area and body mass index were measured, on a solitary slice, at the level of the L5/S1 disc. Linear regression was calculated for independent determinants of the mesorectal volume. Mean mesorectal volume in males was 227.5 cm³ (95%CI 191.6–263.4), and in females was 157.5 cm³ (95%CI 129.3–185.7). The difference in mesorectal volume between men and women was statistically significant (p<0.001). Mean visceral compartment area in males was 18.4 cm² (95%CI 16.3–20.5) and in females was 14.6 cm² (95%CI 12.8–16.4). Visceral compartment area correlated with mesorectal area and volume in females (p<0.05), and extremely well in males (p<0.005). Body cross-sectional area, body mass index and age did not correlate with mesorectal size. The correlation of visceral compartment area with mesorectal volume and mean area suggests that the mesorectum is determined in a similar way to other body fat compartments, with a similar anatomical variation. This significant variation in size and volume may have an important prognostic implication in patients with rectal carcinoma. This volume can be measured and reported on pre-operative MRI scanning and may be communicated to surgeons and radiotherapists.