BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online August 17, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 177-185
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/19929794

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onnasch, D G W
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, H-H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Onnasch, D G W
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, H-H

Full paper

Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization

D G W Onnasch, PhD, F K Schröder, MD, G Fischer, MD and H-H Kramer, MD

Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University of Kiel, Schwanenweg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany

Correspondence: Dr Dietrich Onnasch, Biomedical Engineering, Paediatric Cardiology, University of Kiel, Schwanenweg 20, Kiel 24105, Germany. E-mail: onnasch{at}pedcard.uni-kiel.de

European states within the EEC are required to establish and use diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in X-ray examinations. However, up to now there have been no DRLs for cardiac catheterization in children, nor as a rule is the effective dose estimated. We have evaluated the dose–area products (DAPs) for three different types of angiocardiography systems over a time span of 8 years. For each system DAP increased in proportion to the body weight (BW) over two orders of magnitude. The proportionality constant decreased over the years. To reduce the broad distribution of DAP the doses for cine acquisition (DAPA) and fluoroscopy (DAPF) were indexed with respect to the total numbers of acquired images (AN) and the total times of fluoroscopy (FT). DAPA/AN is directly proportional to BW with a high correlation (r = 0.896, n = 1346). Likewise, DAPF/FT is proportional to BW from 0.1 kg to 100 kg (r = 0.84, n = 2138). Therefore, by normalizing DAP to BW the growth dependent variation of DAP can be eliminated. There are numerous short examinations with very small total DAPs, which were separated from the group of diagnostic examinations. The mean DAP/BW of this group is 0.41 Gycm2 kg–1 (90th percentile: 0.81 Gycm2 kg–1, n = 1106). For interventional procedures in congenital heart diseases DAP/BW is significantly higher (p<0.001) (mean: 0.56 Gycm2 kg–1, 90th percentile: 1.16 Gycm2 kg–1, n = 883). There are significant differences between different types of interventional procedures, the mean values being between 0.35 Gycm2 kg–1 (occlusion of patent ductus botalli, n = 165) and 1.30 Gycm2 kg–1 (occlusion of ventricular septal defect, n = 32). For patients who are catheterized several times over the years, the cumulative effective dose (E) may reach high values, being especially high for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (typically 11 mSv). E is derived from DAP/BW by use of a constant DAP/BW to E conversion factor, independent of the age of the patient. DAP/BW is appropriate to describe paediatric DRLs and is recommended instead of using mean DAP values for age groups.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
V. Tsapaki, S. Kottou, S. Korniotis, N. Nikolaki, S. Rammos, and S. C. Apostolopoulou
RADIATION DOSES IN PAEDIATRIC INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 2, 2009; (2009) ncn313v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR review of the year -- 2007
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 265 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. Padovani, E. Vano, A. Trianni, C. Bokou, H. Bosmans, D. Bor, J. Jankowski, P. Torbica, K. Kepler, A. Dowling, et al.
Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 104 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.