BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 96-102
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/31311739

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, N J
Right arrow Articles by Brady, A P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, N J
Right arrow Articles by Brady, A P

Full paper

Renal artery embolisation in the palliative treatment of renal carcinoma

N J Maxwell, MB, MRCPI, FFR 1 N Saleem Amer, MB, FFR 1 E Rogers, MB, FRCSI 2 D Kiely, MB, FRCSI 2 P Sweeney, MB, FRCSI 2 and A P Brady, MB, FRCR, FFR 1

Departments of 1 Diagnostic Radiology and 2 Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland

Correspondence: N J Maxwell, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582, USA

The aim of this study is to review the role and technique of renal artery embolisation (RAE), and assess its effectiveness in the palliative treatment of unresectable or inoperable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in our institution. The study group consisted of 19 consecutive patients (16 male, 3 female; age range 47–87 years) who underwent palliative RAE for the treatment of renal carcinoma between January 2000 and December 2005. Unresectable disease was present in 11 patients (3 stage IVa, 8 stage IVb). Potentially resectable disease was present in 8 patients (4 stage II, 1 stage IIIa, 1 stage IIIb, 2 stage IIIc); however, these patients were unfit for surgery for other reasons. 13 patients presented with haematuria, which was gross in 7 patients. Nine patients complained of flank pain. RAE was performed using polyvinyl alcohol or embosphere particles, metallic coils and, in some cases, absolute alcohol was necessary. At the time of analysis, 12 patients had died while 7 patients were still alive, with an overall median survival for the study group of 6 months. In the 7 patients with transfusion dependant gross haematuria, there was stabilization of the haemoglobin level post-embolisation. In the 9 patients who presented with flank pain, symptoms improved or resolved in 8 patients. The median length of hospital stay for the 18 patients who were discharged was 5.0 days. RAE is a safe and tolerable management option for patients with inoperable or unresectable renal carcinoma as a means of palliation of local symptoms and improving clinical status, with low morbidity and shorter hospital stay.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M MAY, S BROOKMAN-AMISSAH, S PFLANZ, J ROIGAS, B HOSCHKE, and F KENDEL
Pre-operative renal arterial embolisation does not provide survival benefit in patients with radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2009; 82(981): 724 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.