BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online August 17, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2007) 80, 26-31
© 2007 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/59538862
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H
Right arrow Articles by Cook, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren-Forward, H
Right arrow Articles by Cook, A

Full paper

An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior–anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine

H Warren-Forward, BSc, PhD, L Arthur, BMRS, L Hobson, BMRS, R Skinner, BMRS, A Watts, BMRS, K Clapham, BMRS, D Lou, BMRS and A Cook, BMRS

Medical Radiation Science, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

Correspondence: Dr Helen M Warren-Forward, Medical Radiation Science, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Box 16, Hunter Building, University Drive, Callaghan, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia. E-mail: helen.warren-forward{at}newcastle.edu.au

Studies have indicated that computed radiography (CR) can increase radiation dose to the patient, leading to potential biological effects. Although manufacturers have set parameters to safeguard against overexposure, it is unclear whether these are being used by radiographers or if their recommended values are consistent with the ALARA principle. The research aims are to investigate (i) whether radiographers are producing images with exposure indices within the manufacturers recommended range (MRR); (ii) the phenomenon of exposure creep, and (iii) the relationship between exposure indices (EIs) and radiation dose. A retrospective analysis of exposure indices over an 18-month period for the posteroanterior (PA) chest and lateral (LAT) lumbar spine at two centres using Kodak 800 and 850 CR systems was conducted. A phantom study was performed to assess the relationship between EI and entrance surface dose (ESD) for fixed and varying tube potentials. Kodak recommends that images have EIs between 1700 and 1900. Thirty percent of LAT lumbar spine examinations at hospital B and 38% of PA chest examinations at hospital A were produced with EIs below 1700. In the phantom study, when using a varied tube potential (70–125 kVp) and maintaining a constant EI of 1550, ESD was reduced by 56%. All clinical and phantom images were assessed to be of a diagnostic quality. The retrospective results indicate that there is a potential to reduce the MRR and optimize patient dose. There is also evidence to suggest that EI is not a reliable indicator of patient dose. The authors recommend that staff training is essential on these newer systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
I. A. Tsalafoutas, G. A. Blastaris, A. S. Moutsatsos, P. S. Chios, and E. P. Efstathopoulos
CORRELATION OF IMAGE QUALITY WITH EXPOSURE INDEX AND PROCESSING PROTOCOL IN A COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 2, 2008; (2008) ncm493v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.