BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, S123-S126
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/37622515

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karssemeijer, N
Right arrow Articles by Holland, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karssemeijer, N
Right arrow Articles by Holland, R

Full paper

Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support

N Karssemeijer, PhD 1 J D M Otten, MS 2 H Rijken 3 and R Holland, MD, PhD 3

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 1 Department of Radiology, 2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and 3 National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Nico Karssemeijer, Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail: n.karssemeijer{at}rad.umcn.nl

Performance of a computer aided detection (CAD) system for masses in mammograms was investigated. Using data collected in an observer study, in which experienced screening radiologists read a series of 500 screening mammograms without CAD, performance of radiologists was compared to the standalone performance of the CAD system. Due to a larger number of FPs (false positives), the performance of CAD was lower than that of the readers. However, when analysis was restricted to mammographic regions identified by the radiologists, it was found that the CAD system was comparable to the readers in discriminating these regions in cancer and non-cancer. In a retrospective analysis, the effect of independent combination of reader scores with CAD was compared to independent combination of scores of two radiologists. No significant difference was found between the results of these two methods. Both methods improved single reading results significantly.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.