BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, S16-S26
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/84072695

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, G S
Right arrow Articles by Leach, M O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payne, G S
Right arrow Articles by Leach, M O

Full paper

Applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in radiotherapy treatment planning

G S Payne, DPhil and M O Leach, PhD, FInstP, FMedSci

Cancer Research UK Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research Group, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

Following advances in conformal radiotherapy, a key problem now facing radiation oncologists is target definition. While MRI and CT provide images of excellent spatial resolution, they do not always provide sufficient contrast to identify tumour extent or to identify regions of high cellular activity that might be targeted with boost doses. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is an alternative approach that holds great promise for aiding target definition for radiotherapy treatment planning, and for evaluation of response and recurrence. MRS is able to detect signals from low molecular weight metabolites such as choline and creatine that are present at concentrations of a few mM in tissue. Spectra may be acquired from single voxels, or from a 2D or 3D array of voxels using spectroscopic imaging. The current state of the art achieves a spatial resolution of 6–10 mm in a scan time of about 10–15 min. Co-registered MR images are acquired in the same examination. The method is currently under evaluation, in particular in brain (where MRS has been shown to differentiate between many tumour types and grades) and in prostate (where cancer may be distinguished from normal tissue and benign prostatic hypertrophy). The contrast achieved with MRS, based on tissue biochemistry, therefore provides a promising alternative for identifying tumour extent and regions of high metabolic activity. It is anticipated that MRS will become an essential tool for treatment planning where other modalities lack the necessary contrast.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.