This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shrimpton, P C Articles by Dunn, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shrimpton, P C Articles by Dunn, M

National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003

¹ Radiation Protection Division (formerly NRPB), Health Protection Agency, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, ² ImPACT, Department of Medical Physics, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, ³ Medical Physics Department, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

Correspondence: Dr Paul C Shrimpton, Radiation Protection Division, Health Protection Agency, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK. E-mail: paul.shrimpton{at}hpa-rp.org.uk

A review of patient doses from CT examinations in the UK for 2003 has been conducted on the basis of data received from over a quarter of all UK scanners, of which 37% had multislice capability. Questionnaires were employed to collect scan details both for the standard protocols established at each scanner for 12 common types of CT examination on adults and children, and for samples of individual patients. This information was combined with published scanner-specific CT dose index (CTDI) coefficients to estimate values of the standard dose indices CTDI_w and CTDI_vol for each scan sequence. Knowledge of each scan length allowed assessment of the dose–length product (DLP) for each examination, from which effective doses were then estimated. When compared with a previous UK survey for 1991, wide variations were still apparent between CT centres in the doses for standard protocols. The mean UK doses for adult patients were in general lower by up to 50% than those for 1991, although doses were slightly higher for multislice (4+) (MSCT) relative to single slice (SSCT) scanners. Values of CTDI_vol for MSCT were broadly similar to European survey data for 2001. The third quartile values of these dose distributions have been used to derive UK national reference doses for examinations on adults (separately for SSCT and MSCT) and children as initial tools for promoting patient protection. The survey has established the PREDICT (Patient Radiation Exposure and Dose in CT) database as a sustainable national resource for monitoring dose trends in CT through the ongoing collation of further survey data.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. E. Muhogora, N. A. Ahmed, A. Beganovic, A. Benider, O. Ciraj-Bjelac, V. Gershan, E. Gershkevitsh, E. Grupetta, M. H. Kharita, N. Manatrakul, et al. Patient doses in CT Examinations in 18 countries: initial results from international atomic energy agency projects Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2009; 136(2): 118 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Singh, M. K. Kalra, M. A. Moore, R. Shailam, B. Liu, T. L. Toth, E. Grant, and S. J. Westra Dose Reduction and Compliance with Pediatric CT Protocols Adapted to Patient Size, Clinical Indication, and Number of Prior Studies Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 200 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sodickson, P. F. Baeyens, K. P. Andriole, L. M. Prevedello, R. D. Nawfel, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani Recurrent CT, Cumulative Radiation Exposure, and Associated Radiation-induced Cancer Risks from CT of Adults Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 175 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K LEDENIUS, M GUSTAVSSON, S JOHANSSON, F STALHAMMAR, L-M WIKLUND, and A Thilander-KLANG Effect of tube current on diagnostic image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2009; 82(976): 313 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D HART, M C HILLIER, and B F WALL National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Huda, K. M. Ogden, and M. R. Khorasani Converting Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose at CT Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 995 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J A SOYE and A PATERSON A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 725 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, L. M. Hurwitz, and P. C. Goodman Computing Effective Doses from Dose-Length Product in CT Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 321 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Martin Patient dose studies: what should be reported? Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 24, 2008; (2008) ncn070v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Martin RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sinha, C. Nwokolo, and P. D Murphy Magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's disease BMJ, February 2, 2008; 336(7638): 273 - 276. [Full Text] [PDF]