| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Full paper |
1 Medical Physics Department, 2 Accident and Emergency Department, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
New flat-panel direct digital radiography equipment has recently been installed in our Accident and Emergency Department; its characteristics and versatility are well suited to the work undertaken in this environment. The aim of this study was to compare radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations using conventional screenfilm radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography; entrance surface dose and effective dose were calculated for six standard examinations (a total of 10 projections) using standard patient exposure parameters for the three imaging modalities. It was found that doses for computed radiography (all examinations) were higher than the doses for the other two modalities; effective doses for direct digital radiography were
29% and
43% lower than those for screenfilm radiography and computed radiography, respectively. The image quality met the criteria in the European guidelines for all modalities.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Compagnone, L. Pagan, M. C. Baleni, F. L. Calzolaio, L. Barozzi, and C. Bergamini Patient dose in digital projection radiography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 135 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |