BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online May 25, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 888-892
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/66519303

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mori, S
Right arrow Articles by Endo, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mori, S
Right arrow Articles by Endo, M

Full paper

Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner

S Mori, PhD, MPH, RT, K Nishizawa, PhD, MPH, M Ohno, MSc, MPH and M Endo, PhD, MPH

Department of Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-8555, Japan

Recent rapid progress in CT technology has yielded equipment with large numbers of detector rows and standard computed tomography dose index (CTDI) is therefore no longer an adequate integration range. An integration range of 300 mm is necessary to accurately measure dose under a nominal beam width of 128 mm due to scattered radiation. However, such a long phantom is inconvenient to use routinely in cone-beam CT patient dose checking. To assess patient dose accurately with standard dosimetry methods, we determined a conversion factor (CF) which was calculated from the weighted dose profile integral (DPIw) for the 300 mm integration range with a 300 mm long CTDI phantom using a 300 mm long ionization chamber divided by that for the 100 mm integration range with a standard CTDI phantom (140 mm long) with a 100 mm long chamber. CF values increase with increasing nominal beam width and effective energy in the range from 1.5 to 2.0. CF values can also be adapted for use with other CT systems as their dose profiles are thought to be analogous to those for the 300 mm phantom and are useful in any hospital situation to assess accurate patient doses using standard dosimetry methods.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.