BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online August 2, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 866-869
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/68149575

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clewer, P R
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, P C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clewer, P R
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, P C

Commentary

Reporting overexposures and unintended exposures in diagnostic procedures

P R Clewer, MPhil, MSRP, MIPEM and P C Jackson, BSc, PhD, FIPEM

Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK

Correspondence: Mr Philip Clewer, Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. E-mail: philip.clewer{at}suht.swest.nhs.uk.

Legislation requires the reporting to regulatory authorities of incidents in which patients have been exposed to ionizing radiation to an extent "much greater than that intended". The authorities have published guidance on what is considered to meet this requirement. However, there is still some confusion regarding, particularly, the necessity to report some unintended doses. It is believed that there is a disproportionate amount of resource spent investigating some unintended exposures because all such exposures will have an effective overexposure factor of infinity, irrespective of the magnitude of the dose and the associated risk. This paper proposes changing the definitions of "overexposure" and "unintended exposure" and the adoption of a reporting process based upon risk assessment. All records and data would be collected and, if required, reported, but investigation of individual incidents would take place only for incidents carrying a greater risk than 1 in 10 000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M V Williams
Improving patient safety in radiotherapy by learning from near misses, incidents and errors
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.