BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online July 19, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 818-827
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/16416346

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, B
Right arrow Articles by Osei, E K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, B
Right arrow Articles by Osei, E K

Full paper

Normalized data for the estimation of fetal radiation dose from radiotherapy of the breast

B Bradley, BSc 1 A Fleck, BSc, MSc 2 and E K Osei, BSc, MSc, PhD 2,3

1 Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, 2 Department of Medical Physics, Grand River Regional Cancer Center, 835 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario, 3 Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence: Ernest K Osei, Department of Medical Physics, Grand River Regional Cancer Center, 835 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. E-mail: ernestkwaku.osei{at}grhosp.on.ca.

There can be several reasons why a pregnant patient may receive a radiological examination. It could have been a planned exposure, or the exposure might have resulted from an emergency when a thorough evaluation of pregnancy was impractical. Sometimes the pregnancy was unsuspected at the time of the examination and, with younger women being diagnosed with breast cancer, the likelihood of this will increase in radiotherapy departments. Whatever the reason, when presented with a pregnant patient who has received a radiological examination involving ionizing radiation, the dose to the fetus should be assessed based on the patient's treatment plan. However, a major source of uncertainty in the estimation of fetal absorbed dose is the influence of fetal size and position as these change with gestational age. Consequently, dose to the fetus is related to gestational age. Various studies of fetal dose during pregnancy have appeared in the literature. Whilst these papers contain many useful data for estimating fetal dose, they usually contain limited data regarding the depth and size of the fetus within the maternal uterus. We have investigated doses to the fetus from radiation therapy of the breast of a pregnant patient using an anthropomorphic phantom. Normalized data for estimating fetal doses that takes into account the fetal size (gestational age: 8–20 weeks post-conception) and depth within the maternal abdomen (4–16 cm) for different treatment techniques have been provided. The data indicate that fetal dose is dependent on both depth within the maternal abdomen and gestational age, and hence these factors should always be considered when estimating fetal dose. The data show that fetal dose can be underestimated up to about 10% or overestimated up to about 30% if the dose to the uterus is assumed instead of the actual fetal dose. It can also be underestimated up to about 23% or overestimated up to about 12% if a mean depth of 9 cm is assumed, instead of using the actual depth of the fetus within the maternal abdomen. Multi-segments sMLC technique showed consistently lower fetal doses compared with all the wedged plans employed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R M Harrison, M Wilkinson, D J Rawlings, and M Moore
Doses to critical organs following radiotherapy and concomitant imaging of the larynx and breast
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 989 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.