BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online April 26, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 740-744
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/55953054

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A H
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A H
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J

Full paper

Feasibility of automated matching of supine and prone CT-colonography examinations

A H de Vries, MD1, R Truyen, MSc2, J van der Peijl, MSc2, J Florie, MD1, R E van Gelder, MD1, F Gerritsen, MSc2 and J Stoker, MD1

1 Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, 2 Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands

Matching of prone and supine positions in CT colonography may improve accuracy of polyp detection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of automatic prone-supine matching in CT-colonography using proven polyps as fixed points of reference. The method is based on similarities in the direction of centre-lines and allows for compression and extraction of the centre-lines in both positions. To illustrate the impact of the match error of the new method in practice, the visibility of the matched polyps in a primary three-dimensional unfolded cube setting was determined as well. The method was compared with a method that relies on the normalized distance along the centre-line (NDAC method). The median absolute match error was 14 mm (range 0–59 mm, average 20 mm) either proximal or distal from the actual polyp in prone position. In the observer study, 70% (26/37) of the polyps were directly visible in prone view. The overall difference in median absolute match error between both methods was small (2 mm), although half way along the centre-line there were polyps with substantial differences in match error (larger with NDAC). We concluded that automated prone-supine matching of CT-colonography studies is feasible and has a low match error. The difference with the NDAC method was small and not significant, although half way along the centre-line some differences were seen.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.