BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online June 22, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 730-733
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/75766147

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, C
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, C
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, D

Full paper

Six years experience in intracoronary brachytherapy procedures: patient doses from fluoroscopy

C Prieto, BSc1, E Vano, PhD1,4, J M Fernández, BSc1,4, C Galvan, MD, PhD2,4, M Sabate, MD, PhD3, L Gonzalez, PhD4 and D Martinez, BSc1

1 Medical Physics Service, 2 Radiotherapy Service and, 3 Interventional Cardiology Service, San Carlos University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, 4 Radiology Department, Medicine School, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Typical patient dose levels during intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) procedures using beta sources were determined across a sample of 221 treatments. Dose–area product values, fluoroscopy time and number of frames per procedure, with median values of 62 Gy cm2, 17.0 min and 1493 images, respectively, resulted in a 20% to 50% increase in the values measured for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures in the same medical centre (median values 41 Gy cm2, 14.3 min and 1078 images). Likely reasons for this increase include the additional complexity of ICB, the need for recording and reporting every step of the treatment, getting the essential parameters for the volume determination of the lesion and therapeutic radiation dose calculation and, finally, the learning curve for this kind of procedure. A high concentration skin dose distribution during ICB procedures was measured and in 12% of the patients peak skin doses higher than 1.5 Gy were confirmed. 10 patients were submitted to clinical follow-up and skin injuries were not identified.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.