BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
First published online April 26, 2006
British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 644-651
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/76128583
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Theocharopoulos, N
Right arrow Articles by Gourtsoyiannis, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Theocharopoulos, N
Right arrow Articles by Gourtsoyiannis, N

Full paper

Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden

N Theocharopoulos, MSc 1,2 J Damilakis, PhD 1 K Perisinakis, PhD 1 E Manios, MD 3 P Vardas, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC 3 and N Gourtsoyiannis, MD, PhD 4

1 Departments of Medical Physics, 3 Cardiology and 4 Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete and 2 Department of Natural Sciences, Technological Education Institute of Crete, P.O. Box 140, Iraklion 71004, Crete, Greece

Correspondence: J Damilakis, Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece

Fluoroscopically guided procedures in the electrophysiology room, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation and implantation of cardiac resynchronization devices, may result in high radiation exposure of electrophysiologists and assisting staff. Our aim was to provide accurate and applicable data on occupational doses to the electrophysiology laboratory personnel. We exposed fluoroscopically an anthropomorphic phantom at three projections common in electrophysiology studies. For each exposure, scattered radiation was measured at 182 sites of the cardiology room at four body levels. Effective dose values, eye lens, skin and gonadal doses to the laboratory staff were calculated. Our study has shown that a procedure requiring 40 min of fluoroscopy yields a maximum effective dose of 129 µSv and a maximum value of gonadal dose of 56.8 µSv to staff using a 0.35 mm lead-equivalent apron. A conservative estimate of the electrophysiologist's annual maximum permissible workload is 155 procedures. Staff effective dose values vary by a factor of 40 due to positioning during fluoroscopy and by a factor of 11 due to radiation protection equipment. Undercouch protective shields may reduce gonadal doses up to 98% and effective dose up to 25%. Consequently, radiation levels in the electrophysiology room are not negligible. Mitigation of occupational exposure is feasible through good fluoroscopy and working practices.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
A REVIEW OF RADIOLOGY STAFF DOSES AND DOSE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 16, 2009; (2009) ncp168v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
K. P. Kim and D. L. Miller
MINIMISING RADIATION EXPOSURE TO PHYSICIANS PERFORMING FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CARDIAC CATHETERISATION PROCEDURES: A REVIEW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 27, 2009; (2009) ncp052v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
O. Dragusin, R. Weerasooriya, P. Jais, M. Hocini, J. Ector, Y. Takahashi, M. Haissaguerre, H. Bosmans, and H. Heidbuchel
Evaluation of a radiation protection cabin for invasive electrophysiological procedures
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2007; 28(2): 183 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.