BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 584-591
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/54853087

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T

Full paper

Prophylactic implantation of inferior vena cava filter during interventional radiological treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity

T Yamagami, MD, PhD T Kato, MD T Hirota, MD R Yoshimatsu, MD T Matsumoto, MD and T Nishimura, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-chyo, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the filtering effect of the Gunther tulip retrievable vena cava filter (GTF) during treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremity using various interventional radiological procedures. Subjects of the study were all 17 consecutive patients (8 women, 9 men; age range 18–87 years; mean age 55.9 years) with symptomatic lower limb DVT referred for interventional radiological treatment between February 2001 and September 2004. In all of these patients, the GTF was implanted during interventional radiological treatment. Trapped thrombus in the filter was evaluated with venocavography performed repeatedly during the treatment for DVT. Implantation of a total of 29 GTFs was successfully performed in the 17 patients. In 10 (58.8%), more than 2 filters were subsequently implanted to prolong implantation time. Also in 10 patients, the DVT resolved after therapy and retrieval of the final GTF was successful with one exception. Worsening of or new formation of pulmonary embolism was avoided in all patients. In 8 (47.1%) of the 17 patients, a trapped thrombus in the GTF was observed during treatment for DVT. In six patients the trapped thrombus was large, filling more than half the height of the filter. In conclusion, we found that the GTF is effective in filtering the relieved thrombus from DVT in the lower extremity and in protecting against movement of the thrombus to the pulmonary artery during therapies with interventional radiological procedures.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.