BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 483-486
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/67632946

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hidajat, N
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, R-J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hidajat, N
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, R-J

Full paper

Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

N Hidajat, MD, P Wust, MD, M Kreuschner, MD, R Felix, MD and R-J Schröder, MD

Department of Radiology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany

The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiation dose to the interventional radiologist in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) concerning the risk of cancer and deterministic radiation effects and the relation to recommended dose limits. In 18 TIPS interventions radiation doses were measured with thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD) fixed at the eyebrow, thyroid and hand of the radiologist without special lead shielding of these body parts and at the chest, abdomen and testes under the lead apron. The doses of the eye lens, thyroid gland and hand were assumed to be equal to the corresponding surface doses. The dose at the abdomen under the lead apron was used as an estimation of the ovarian dose. Effective dose equivalent was estimated by Webster's method. The estimated effective dose equivalent was 0.087 mSv and the effective dose 0.110 mSv. The risk of fatal cancer was of 10–6 and the risk of severe genetic defect of 10–7 for one single intervention. The maximum permissible number of TIPS interventions was 181, otherwise the dose limit for effective dose would be exceeded. When the radiologist performed more than 372 TIPS procedures per year for many years, the dose to the lens of the eye could exceed the threshold for cataract. If the interventionist performs a large number of TIPS procedures in a year, the risk of fatal cancer and developing cataracts becomes relatively high.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.