This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vaño, E Articles by Macaya, C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vaño, E Articles by Macaya, C

Occupational radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a 15-year follow-up

¹ Department of Radiology, Complutense University Medical School 28040 Madrid, Spain, ² San Carlos University Hospital, Medical Physics Service, ³ Cardiovascular Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Correspondence: Prof. Luciano Gonzalez

This report describes occupational radiation doses of interventional cardiologists over 15 years and assesses action undertaken to optimize radiation protection. Personal dosimetry records of nine staff cardiologists and eight interventional cardiology fellows were recorded using personal dosemeters worn over and under their lead aprons. The hospital in which this study was conducted currently performs 5000 cardiology procedures per year. The hospital has improved its facilities since 1989, when it had two old-fashioned theatres, to include four rooms with more advanced and safer equipment. Intensive radiation protection training was also implemented since 1989. Initially, some individual dose values in the range of 100–300 mSv month^–1, which risked exceeding some regulatory dose limits, were measured over the lead apron. Several doses in the range of 5–11 mSv month^–1 were recorded under the apron (mean = 10.2 mSv year^–1). During the last 5 years of the study, after the implementation of the radiation protection actions and a programme of patient-dose optimization, the mean dose under the apron was reduced to 1.2 mSv year^–1. Current mean occupational doses recorded under the lead apron are 14% of those recorded during 1989–1992 and those recorded over the apron are 14-fold less than those recorded during 1989–1992. The regulatory dose limits and the threshold for lens injuries might have been exceeded if radiation protection facilities had not been used systematically. The most effective actions involved in reducing the radiation risk were training in radiation protection, a programme of patient-dose reduction and the systematic use of radiation protection facilities, specifically ceiling-suspended protective screens.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Moritake, Y. Matsumaru, T. Takigawa, K. Nishizawa, A. Matsumura, and K. Tsuboi Dose Measurement on Both Patients and Operators during Neurointerventional Procedures Using Photoluminescence Glass Dosimeters AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1910 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G BEDETTI, N BOTTO, M G ANDREASSI, C TRAINO, E VANO, and E PICANO Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Vano, L. Gonzalez, J. M. Fernandez, and Z. J. Haskal Eye Lens Exposure to Radiation in Interventional Suites: Caution Is Warranted Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P P Dendy Radiation risks in interventional radiology Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Andreassi, A. Cioppa, S. Manfredi, C. Palmieri, N. Botto, and E. Picano Acute chromosomal DNA damage in human lymphocytes after radiation exposure in invasive cardiovascular procedures Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2195 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				BJR review of the year - 2006 Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 147 - 151. [Full Text] [PDF]