BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 372-377
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/26216335

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Rijn, J C
Right arrow Articles by Majoie, C B L M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Rijn, J C
Right arrow Articles by Majoie, C B L M

Full paper

Observer variation in the evaluation of lumbar herniated discs and root compression: spiral CT compared with MRI

J C van Rijn, MD1, N Klemetso, MD2, J B Reitsma, MD, PhD1, P M Bossuyt, PhD1, F J Hulsmans, MD, PhD2, W C Peul, MD, PhD4, G J den Heeten, MD, PhD2, J Stam, MD, PhD3 and C B L M Majoie, MD, PhD2

Departments of 1 Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 2 Radiology and, 3 Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam and the, 4 Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands

Spiral CT is considered the best alternative for MRI in the evaluation of herniated discs. The purpose of this study was to compare radiological evaluation of spiral CT with MRI in patients suspected of herniated discs. 57 patients with lumbosacral radicular syndrome underwent spiral CT and 1.5 T MRI. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated 171 intervertebral discs for herniation or "bulge" and 456 nerve roots for root compression, once after CT and once after MRI. We compared interobserver agreement using the kappa statistic and we performed a paired comparison between CT and MRI. For detection of herniated or bulging discs, we observed no significant difference in interobserver agreement (CT kappa 0.66 vs MRI kappa 0.71; p = 0.40). For root compression, we observed significantly better interobserver agreement at MRI evaluation (CT kappa 0.59 vs MRI kappa 0.78; p = 0.01). In 30 of 171 lumbar discs (18%) and in 54 of 456 nerve roots (12%), the observers disagreed on whether CT results were similar to MRI. In the cases without disagreement, CT differed from MRI in 6 discs (3.5%) and in 3 nerve roots (0.7%). For radiological evaluation of lumbar herniated discs, we found no evidence that spiral CT is inferior to MRI. For evaluating lumbar nerve root compression, spiral CT is less reliable than MRI.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.