BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 258-260
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/43028256

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ignotus, P
Right arrow Articles by Berry, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ignotus, P
Right arrow Articles by Berry, J

Short communication

CT fluoroscopic guided insertion of inferior vena cava filters

P Ignotus, FRCS Ed, FRCR C Wetton, MRCP, FRCR and J Berry, FRCR

Kent and Sussex Hospital, Mount Ephraim, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8AT, UK

The value and use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters is well documented and has been growing since the first reported filter placement in 1973 and the first percutaneous insertion in 1982. Access routes now include both jugular veins, both ante-cubital veins and both femoral veins. However, all insertions require some form of imaging, usually fluoroscopy, to identify the location of the filter with respect to the IVC and the renal veins. We describe two cases where the patients' weight was significantly greater than the weight limit of the angiography table, necessitating insertion under CT fluoroscopic guidance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.