This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heyes, G J Articles by Charles, M W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heyes, G J Articles by Charles, M W

Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme

¹ Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, ² Radiation Biophysics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Recent radiobiological studies have provided compelling evidence that the low energy X-rays as used in mammography are approximately four times – but possibly as much as six times – more effective in causing mutational damage than higher energy X-rays. Since current radiation risk estimates are based on the effects of high energy gamma radiation, this implies that the risks of radiation-induced breast cancers for mammography X-rays are underestimated by the same factor. The balance of risk and benefit for breast screening have been re-analysed for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values between 1 and 6 for mammography X-rays. Also considered in the analysis is a change in the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) from 2 to 1, women with larger than average breasts and implications for women with a family history of breast cancer. A potential increase in RBE to 6 and the adoption of a DDREF of unity does not have any impact on the breast screening programme for women aged 50–70 years screened on a 3 yearly basis. Situations for which breast screening is not justified due to the potential cancers induced relative to those detected (the detection-to-induction ratio (DIR)) are given for a range of RBE and DDREF values. It is concluded that great caution is needed if a programme of early regular screening with X-rays is to be used for women with a family history of breast cancer since DIR values are below 10 (the lowest value considered acceptable for women below 40 years) even for modest increases in the RBE for mammography X-rays.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Kennedy, T. Lee, and D. Seely A Comparative Review of Thermography as a Breast Cancer Screening Technique Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2009; 8(1): 9 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]

				BJR review of the year - 2006 Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 147 - 151. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B M Moores Relative biological effectiveness and exposure of the female breast Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 80(950): 141 - 142. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G J Heyes, A J Mill, and M W Charles Authors' reply Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2006; 79(946): 852 - 854. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J L Redpath and R E J Mitchel Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2006; 79(946): 854 - 855. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Law, K Faulkner, and K C Young RBE for mammographic X-ray energies. Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2006; 79(946): 851 - 852. [Full Text] [PDF]