This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Iball, G R Articles by Moore, A C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Iball, G R Articles by Moore, A C

Assessment of tube current modulation in pelvic CT

Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

An anatomically shaped polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom was used to assess the effect of the Siemens CARE Dose mA modulation system on pelvic CT scans. The effect of the system on absorbed dose to air, image percentage noise and the signal to noise ratio of clinically relevant details was assessed. The signal to noise ratio was calculated using Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and distilled water inserts; PTFE was used to represent bony structure and distilled water was used to represent soft tissue abscess. Pelvis protocols identified from local hospitals and the UK CT Dose Survey (2002), were assessed and compared with those provided by Siemens Medical (UK). These protocols were tested on a Siemens Sensation 4 CT scanner, both with and without CARE Dose. Results were obtained which showed that dose savings were possible with no significant increase in image noise. Dose reductions were 8% in the lateral positions in the phantom and 42% in the centre, top and bottom. The calculated "CTDIvol" was 32% lower with CARE Dose than without CARE Dose. This is slightly greater than the 25% change in the effective mAs values that was found. This implies that the reduction in the effective mAs values is a reasonable predictor of the total reduction in absorbed dose to air, whilst slightly underestimating the actual change. The results also showed a non-significant trend towards decreased signal to noise ratios for clinically relevant CT numbers when CARE Dose was activated. This suggests that tube current modulation may detrimentally affect signal detection due to changes in image noise.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Neville, C. Anderson-Evans, S. Long, C. Lowry, T. T. Yoshizumi, and G. Toncheva Early First Trimester Fetal Dose Estimation Method in a Multivendor Study of 16- and 64-MDCT Scanners and Low-Dose Imaging Protocols Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 1019 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Vano, C. Ubeda, J. M. Fernandez, R. M. Sanchez, and C. Prieto Dose assessment during the commissioning of flat detector imaging systems for cardiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, August 1, 2009; 136(1): 30 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. I. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, L. M. Hurwitz, and R. C. Nelson Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]