BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 62-70
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/50019934

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iball, G R
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iball, G R
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A C

Full Paper

Assessment of tube current modulation in pelvic CT

G R Iball, MSc, DipIPEM, D S Brettle, PhD and A C Moore, MSc, DipIPEM

Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

An anatomically shaped polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom was used to assess the effect of the Siemens CARE Dose mA modulation system on pelvic CT scans. The effect of the system on absorbed dose to air, image percentage noise and the signal to noise ratio of clinically relevant details was assessed. The signal to noise ratio was calculated using Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and distilled water inserts; PTFE was used to represent bony structure and distilled water was used to represent soft tissue abscess. Pelvis protocols identified from local hospitals and the UK CT Dose Survey (2002), were assessed and compared with those provided by Siemens Medical (UK). These protocols were tested on a Siemens Sensation 4 CT scanner, both with and without CARE Dose. Results were obtained which showed that dose savings were possible with no significant increase in image noise. Dose reductions were 8% in the lateral positions in the phantom and 42% in the centre, top and bottom. The calculated "CTDIvol" was 32% lower with CARE Dose than without CARE Dose. This is slightly greater than the 25% change in the effective mAs values that was found. This implies that the reduction in the effective mAs values is a reasonable predictor of the total reduction in absorbed dose to air, whilst slightly underestimating the actual change. The results also showed a non-significant trend towards decreased signal to noise ratios for clinically relevant CT numbers when CARE Dose was activated. This suggests that tube current modulation may detrimentally affect signal detection due to changes in image noise.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. I. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, L. M. Hurwitz, and R. C. Nelson
Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 860 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.