BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, S57-S62
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/25777270

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bogoni, L
Right arrow Articles by Macari, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bogoni, L
Right arrow Articles by Macari, M

Paper

Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need

L Bogoni, PhD 1 P Cathier, PhD 1 M Dundar, PhD 1 A Jerebko, PhD 1 S Lakare, PhD 1 J Liang, PhD 1 S Periaswamy, PhD 1 M E Baker, MD 2 and M Macari, MD 3

1 Computer Aided Diagnosis and Therapy, Siemens Medical Solutions, Malven, PA, 2 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH and 3 NYU Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both men and women. It is estimated that in 2004, nearly 147 000 cases of colon and rectal cancer will be diagnosed in the USA, and approximately 57 000 people would die from the disease; however, only 44% of the eligible population undergoes any type of colorectal cancer screening. Many reasons have been identified for non-compliance, with key ones being patient comfort, bowel preparation and cost. Virtual colonoscopy derived from computed tomography (CT) images is gaining broader acceptance as a screening method for colorectal neoplasia. Our research suggests that computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader has great potential in improving polyp detection. The ColonCAD prototype presented in this paper was developed and tested on cases representative of the variability and quality in true clinical practice. Results of this study with 150 patients demonstrate that: the developed algorithm generalises well: the sensitivity for polyps =>ge;6 mm is on average 90%; and the median false positive rate is a manageable 3 per volume.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Hock, R. Ouhadi, R. Materne, A.-S. Aouchria, I. Mancini, T. Broussaud, P. Magotteaux, and A. Nchimi
Virtual Dissection CT Colonography: Evaluation of Learning Curves and Reading Times with and without Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 860 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. M. Summers, L. R. Handwerker, P. J. Pickhardt, R. L. Van Uitert, K. K. Deshpande, S. Yeshwant, J. Yao, and M. Franaszek
Performance of a Previously Validated CT Colonography Computer-Aided Detection System in a New Patient Population
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 168 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Taylor, R. Greenhalgh, R. Ilangovan, E. Tam, V. A. Sahni, D. Burling, J. Zhang, P. Bassett, P. J. Pickhardt, and S. Halligan
CT Colonography and Computer-aided Detection: Effect of False-Positive Results on Reader Specificity and Reading Efficiency in a Low-Prevalence Screening Population
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S A TAYLOR, D BURLING, M RODDIE, L HONEYFIELD, J MCQUILLAN, P BASSETT, and S HALLIGAN
Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2008; 81(963): 180 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Robinson, S. Halligan, S. A. Taylor, S. Mallett, and D. G. Altman
CT Colonography: A Systematic Review of Standard of Reporting for Studies of Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 426 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Baker, L. Bogoni, N. A. Obuchowski, C. Dass, R. M. Kendzierski, E. M. Remer, D. M. Einstein, P. Cathier, A. Jerebko, S. Lakare, et al.
Computer-aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps: Can It Improve Sensitivity of Less-Experienced Readers? Preliminary Findings
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 140 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Jensch, R. E. van Gelder, J. Florie, M. A. T.-d. Graaf, J. V. Lobe, P. M. M. Bossuyt, S. Bipat, C. Y. Nio, and J. Stoker
Performance of Radiographers in the Evaluation of CT Colonographic Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W249 - W255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.