BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, S20-S25
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/37221979

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Astley, S M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Astley, S M

Paper

Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompting techniques for mammography

S M Astley, PhD

Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT UK

Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems, in which abnormalities are automatically detected and their locations presented to the radiologist as prompts, are increasingly being used to improve reader performance. The performance of CAD systems can be evaluated in two ways: by measuring the performance of the algorithms, or by monitoring the performance of readers using the system. All aspects of evaluation need careful consideration to avoid potential bias. This paper examines a variety of different approaches to evaluation and discusses their relative strengths and weaknesses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.