BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 1069-1074
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/20742408

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cominos, M
Right arrow Articles by Cornes, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cominos, M
Right arrow Articles by Cornes, P

Full Paper

Quantification and reduction of cardiac dose in radical radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

M Cominos, FRCR 1 M A Mosleh-Shirazi, PhD 2 D Tait, FRCR 1 A Henrys, Dip.App.Sc 2 and P Cornes, FRCR 1

1 Department Clinical Oncology and 2 Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

Chemoradiation is increasingly used in the management of localized oesophageal cancer and has been shown in randomized controlled trials to improve overall survival. Although early toxicity of radiotherapy is well documented, this is not the case for late toxicity. As patients with oesophageal cancer have a high incidence of co-morbidities including cardiac problems, the aim of this paper was to quantify the extent of cardiac radiation and discuss the influence of beam arrangement to reduce this. Eight patients with localized oesophageal cancer treated with radical chemoradiation were selected. The mean cardiac dose and the volumes of heart receiving 30 Gy, 40 Gy and 45 Gy from the conventional two-phase technique were compared with those of single-phase 3-field and 4-field conformal beam arrangements. The 4-field arrangement reduced the mean cardiac dose by at least 3.3 Gy compared with the other two beam arrangements (p=0.01). The mean volume of heart receiving high doses between the three techniques widened as the dose increased in the range 30–45 Gy. There is no statistically significant difference in volumes receiving more than 30 Gy and 40 Gy. 65% of the cardiac volume received more than 45 Gy using a two-phase technique, compared with 57% using three fields and 26% using four fields (p<0.01). With a 4-field beam arrangement, therefore, there is a significant reduction in cardiac dose compared with the other two techniques. Cardiac toxicity and a 4-field beam arrangement should be considered when planning radical radiotherapy for localized oesophageal cancer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B Jones and Y Akine
Dose distribution to the mediastinum and heart
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 448 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR Review of the Year - 2005.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 183 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.