BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 939-944
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/40226390

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B
Right arrow Articles by Dale, R G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B
Right arrow Articles by Dale, R G

Full Paper

The potential for mathematical modelling in the assessment of the radiation dose equivalent of cytotoxic chemotherapy given concomitantly with radiotherapy

B Jones, MSc, MD, FRCR1 and R G Dale, MSc, PhD, FIPEM2

1 Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH and 2 Department of Radiation Physics and Radiobiology, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK

The linear quadratic (LQ) concept of biological effective dose (BED) is used with Poisson statistics to estimate the radiation equivalent BED of cytotoxic chemotherapy (CBED) that would provide improvements in tumour control probability (TCP) typically achieved in randomized clinical trials of chemoradiation. The concepts of pure radio-sensitization and independent chemotherapy cell kill are represented by mathematical equations. Small values of sensitizer enhancement ratios (s) can provide modest increases in TCP when large numbers of radiotherapy fractions are sensitized; larger s values are required if only a small number of radiotherapy fractions are sensitized. Independent chemotherapy induced cell kill is sufficient to explain the benefits achieved with concomitant chemoradiotherapy in situations where a sufficiently high chemotherapy dose intensity is used (i.e. the dose–time intensity of cytotoxic chemotherapy without radiation is considered to be sufficient to cause significant tumour regression although not cure). Care is required in the use of the Poisson cure probability model because of the associated steep dose–response curves that may underestimate both s and the CBED. By use of random sampling methods and estimation over a theoretical population of different tumours, more robust results are obtained with dose–response curves that correspond better to those in clinical data sets. These predict a 2–4 Gy10 equivalent for each pulse of chemotherapy such as single agent Cis-Platinum when used weekly during radiotherapy for a maximum of 4 cycles. This preliminary paper does not consider normal tissue complication probabilities, of which there are relatively few mature results for modern chemoradiotherapy. The BED concept can be used to estimate the equivalent dose of radiotherapy that will achieve the same cell kill as concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapy. Relatively simple radiobiological modelling can be used to guide decision-making regarding the assessment of the most appropriate combined modality schedules, and has important implications in the design of clinical trials.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.