BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 922-927
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/75926824

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ono, K
Right arrow Articles by Kusama, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ono, K
Right arrow Articles by Kusama, T

Full Paper

Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen–film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images

K Ono, PhD, RT 1 T Yoshitake, RT 2 K Akahane, PhD 3 Y Yamada, MD 1 T Maeda, MD 1 M Kai, PhD 4 and T Kusama, PhD 4

1 Oita Prefectural Hospital, 476 Bunyo Oita City 870-8511, 2 Shin Beppu Hospital, 3898 Turumi Beppu City 874-0833, 3 National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anakawa, Inageku, Chiba City 263-8555 and 4 Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences, 2944-9 Megusuno, Oita 870-1201, Japan

The purpose of this study was to compare hard copy images from a flat-panel detector digital radiography system with conventional radiography, photofluorographic radiography and storage phosphor radiography for the detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions and also for radiation dose. To test the diagnostic performance of these four systems, the authors used 15 types of lung adenocarcinoma phantom according to Noguchi's classification and an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The visual evaluation of tumour detectability by four radiologists and two general thoracic surgeons was examined with a five-level confidence scale. Lung doses were measured with glass dosemeters for the chest radiology systems under the conditions used by each hospital and centre. Our results indicated that flat-panel detector digital radiography and storage phosphor radiography are not necessarily superior to conventional radiography and photofluorographic radiography for detecting lung adenocarcinomas when only hard copy images are used, and this suggests a need to carefully optimize chest radiography.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Korner, C. H. Weber, S. Wirth, K.-J. Pfeifer, M. F. Reiser, and M. Treitl
Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 675 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.