BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 899-905
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/57562962

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandilos, P
Right arrow Articles by Vlahos, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandilos, P
Right arrow Articles by Vlahos, L

Full Paper

Technical note: evaluation of dosimetric performance in a commercial 3D treatment planning system

P Sandilos, PhD, S Seferlis, MSc, C Antypas, MSc, P Karaiskos, PhD, C Dardoufas, MD and L Vlahos, MD

Department of Radiology, Medical School, Areteion Hospital, University of Athens, 76 Vas. Sophia's Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece

The aim of this work was to evaluate the dosimetric performance of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) which employs a three-dimensional calculation algorithm (Nucletron Plato version 2.2.3), following the guidelines of the AAPM Task Group 23 (TG23). Seven test cases were used to test the TPS dosimetric performance in homogeneous water. These cases involved absolute dose measurements on central as well as off-axis points situated at various depths, using simple field arrangements, and comparison with corresponding TPS calculations. This comparison yielded differences within ±2% at all points, for all test cases. To test the ability of the TPS to account for tissue inhomogeneities, corresponding comparisons were performed with the presence of a low-density material in the beam to resemble an air inhomogeneity. Absolute dose measurements and corresponding TPS calculations showed a mean deviation of the order of ±3.5%, reaching a maximum of 11.5% for small field sizes (5 cm x 5 cm). In summary, observed deviations are well within the set tolerance levels while comparison with previous TPS versions showed that Plato version 2.2.3 is significantly improved, especially in dose calculations in the presence of low density inhomogeneities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Paschalis, P Sandilos, E Tatsis, P Karaiskos, C Antypas, C Chatzigiannis, K Dardoufas, E Georgiou, and L Vlachos
Dosimetric evaluation of a new collimator insert system for stereotactic radiotherapy
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 446 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.