BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (2005) 78, 888-893
© 2005 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/51075444
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shanmugam, V
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, M A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shanmugam, V
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, M A

Full Paper

Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging?

V Shanmugam, MS, DNB, FRCS(GLASG)1, G C Beattie, MB, FRCS1, S R Yule, MB, MRCP, FRCR2, W Reid, MB, FRCR2,3 and M A Loudon, MB, MD, FRCSEd(Gen.Surg)1

Departments of 1 Surgery and 2 Radiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN and 3 Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife KY2 5AH, UK

Correspondence: Mr V Shanmugam, Specialist Registrar, Department of Surgery, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK

The timing and technique of perioperative biliary imaging in relation to laparoscopic surgery remains controversial. This study assessed the predictive value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of biliary pathology. Clinical, laboratory and investigational data were evaluated from 374 patients undergoing MRCP at two hospital sites over a 5-year period. MRCP findings were compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or operative findings and appropriate clinical endpoints. Complete data were available for 351 of the 374 patients (94%), of whom 232 (66%) were female. Median age was 64 years. The predominant presentation was abdominal pain (n=190). Features of pancreatitis were present in 59, cholangitis in 26 and jaundice in 109 patients. Ultrasound was the initial investigation in 312 (89%) (176-gallstone positive). Common duct dilatation was evident in 114 patients and ductal calculi in 31. ERCP was successful in 212/283 (75%) patients. Significant ERCP induced pancreatitis occurred in 12 (5.6%). Comparison between MRCP and ERCP was not possible in 85 due to failure of either technique. Nine patients underwent other investigations including intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC) and were included. Of the 221 patients with full comparative data available the MRCP showed a sensitivity of 97.98% and specificity of 84.4%. MRCP is highly sensitive and specific for choledocholithiasis and avoids the need for invasive imaging in most patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GutHome page
E J Williams, J Green, I Beckingham, R Parks, D Martin, and M Lombard
Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)
Gut, July 1, 2008; 57(7): 1004 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa
Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid. Based Med.Home page
B. Schmitt, M. Baugh, and S. Scaglione
Practice corner: Chair's rounds
Evid. Based Med., October 1, 2007; 12(5): 133 - 134.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2005 by the British Institute of Radiology.